mail
Print view
 

Uploading Medical Data to AI: What Patients Should Know

cnn.com

AI tools can help people understand medical records, laboratory results and wearable-device data. But uploading sensitive health information also raises important questions about privacy and the limits of automated medical advice.

More People Are Using AI for Health Questions

AI is increasingly becoming part of how people seek health information. A US survey found that one in three adults had consulted AI about their health, and many users had uploaded personal medical information.

People may use these tools to interpret test results, review changes in their health or prepare questions for a medical appointment. For some, AI also fills a gap when access to a doctor is limited or unaffordable.

Health Data Requires Special Protection

Medical records can include diagnoses, medications, laboratory values, genetic information and details about mental or reproductive health. Once uploaded to a private AI platform, this information may not be protected by the same rules that apply to hospitals and medical practices.

Several AI companies state that health conversations are encrypted, that uploaded data is not used for advertising or model training, and that users can disconnect or delete their records. Experts nevertheless stress that the risk of hacking, accidental disclosure or future misuse cannot be reduced to zero.

Company Policies Are Not the Same as Health Privacy Law

The United States does not have a comprehensive federal privacy law covering all uses of personal health data by consumer AI services.

Bioethics experts therefore warn that company promises alone may not provide sufficient protection. Data could become vulnerable if a company changes ownership, enters bankruptcy or modifies its policies. The history of consumer genetic testing companies shows how valuable health data can become when businesses fail or are sold.

AI Can Sound Confident Even When It Is Wrong

One of the central risks is that AI-generated health advice may appear clear and convincing despite being incorrect.

AI systems can make factual errors, reproduce racial or gender bias and fail to recognise emergencies. In some cases, they may reassure users when urgent medical evaluation is actually necessary. This is particularly dangerous because an AI chatbot usually provides one direct answer rather than several sources that users can compare.

Serious Conditions May Be Underestimated

Studies of earlier and current health-focused AI systems have found inappropriate treatment recommendations and failures to recommend emergency care.

Problems were reported in scenarios involving cancer treatment, asthma attacks and diabetic ketoacidosis. AI performed better when symptoms clearly matched classic emergencies such as stroke or anaphylaxis. However, when users minimised their symptoms, the system was more likely to make a less urgent recommendation than physicians considered appropriate.

More Information Does Not Always Improve the Answer

It might seem logical that a longer conversation and more medical details would make AI advice more accurate. Research cited in the article found that this was not necessarily the case.

In one study, repeated questioning did not significantly improve performance, and longer conversations sometimes produced worse results. This underlines that AI should not be treated as a substitute for clinical reasoning or professional medical assessment.

Medical Records Can Make AI More Useful

Some clinicians believe that AI becomes more helpful when it can consider a person’s full medical history rather than respond to an isolated symptom.

A detailed record may help the system identify changes in laboratory values, explain specialist reports or recognise connections across hundreds of pages. Patient-portal AI systems may also translate complex records into plain language, assist with appointments and refer users back to healthcare professionals when necessary.

How to Use Health AI More Safely

Experts recommend using AI as a supporting information tool rather than as the final authority on diagnosis or treatment.

Users should check privacy settings, limit how long uploaded information is stored and avoid sharing data that is not necessary. Questions should be phrased as neutrally and factually as possible, since emotional wording may influence the response.

It can also help to begin a new conversation for each medical question, ask the AI for evidence, challenge its conclusions and ask what additional information a doctor would need.

Do Not Delay Emergency Care

AI should never be relied on to decide whether symptoms require emergency treatment.

People experiencing severe pain, breathing difficulties, signs of stroke, loss of consciousness or another potentially life-threatening condition should seek immediate medical help. As one expert in the article stresses, anyone already considering going to an emergency department should not wait for a chatbot to confirm that decision.

Read the ful article here

Autor: Jen Christensen   Quelle: cnn.com (30.07.26; GI-NH)
 
"Going International promotes access to education and training for all regardless of social, geographic and national borders."

Österreichische Akademie der ÄrztenewTreeCenter of ExcellenceAGEM - Arbeitsgemeinschaft Ethnologie und MedizinAnästhesie in Entwicklungsländern e. V.OÖ Gebietskrankenkasse, Referat für Wissenschaftskooperation AMREF - African Medical and Research FoundationEuropean Public Health Association (EUPHA)