Print view
 

Gender-sensitive Workplace Health Promotion: Why It Is Important and How It Can Be Implemented in Practice

Gender-sensitive Workplace Health Promotion

Sex and gender are powerful determinants of health that also influence employment and occupational health. Different genders might be unevenly represented in some positions within an organisation and experience different challenges to health and wellbeing at work. In order to enable all people to benefit from workplace health promotion (WHP), the gender perspective needs to be central to each phase: planning, execution, and evaluation. Unfortunately, criteria for effective gender-sensitive health promotion in the workplace are largely lacking. Aiming to build on good practices and to identify criteria for effective gender-sensitive WHP, the Austrian Health Promotion Fund (FGÖ), a business unit of the Austrian National Public Health Institute, has collected knowledge on gender-sensitive WHP by analysing literature and good practices, the results of which were published last January.

Why should workplace health promotion be gender sensitive?

The main argument for sex and gender-sensitive WHP is that health promotion activities which are attuned to their target audience are more effective than broad but scattershot approaches. Sex and gender-related WHP is also important to fulfil legal, moral or ethical obligations to provide a work environment that promotes good health for both men and women, as well as LGBTQ+ people. Moreover, there are economic arguments to be made for gender-sensitive WHP as well, as effective, tailor-made measures have the potential to prevent health issues, maximise productivity, minimise sick leave, decrease shortages of skilled workers, and increase the organisation’s competitiveness as an employer. This is particularly important in this period of demographic and labour market change. Equal health opportunities for all genders  is also often mentioned as in a goal in equality policies, such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals, that should be reflected in workplace settings as well.

Developing effective gender-sensitive WHP

The research team has conducted a literature review of evidence on gender-sensitive WHP. The choice of which literature to review was based on recommendations by health promotion experts. In order to include real-life examples as well, documentation of five gender-related WHP projects was included. The review led to the identification of criteria, which was carried out according to pre-defined inclusion and exclusion standards. Based on these steps, 17 gender-relevant overarching criteria and 62 checklist questions were defined. When starting a new WHP project, these criteria and questions should be central to every phase of the process.

For one, the gender balance within the organisation should always be acknowledged. In case of an uneven balance, reasons should be considered and solutions for making the positions more attractive and available for all genders should be sought. Such a gender balance analysis should go beyond simply considering the balance in the entire organisation to evaluating gender unbalances in different positions and at different levels as well. To maximise participation of all genders, different motives for participation in WHP activities need to be considered and addressed.

Read more here.

Autor: Sylvia Gaiswinkler   Quelle: EuroHealthNet, 12.06.2020
"Going International promotes access to education and training for all regardless of social, geographic and national borders."
Weitere News
Give us Access to Tigray to Find Missing Refugees — NRC Pleas
Where do UN Diplomats Hide During Politically-Sensitive Voting?
Q&A: Documenting COVID-19 Effect on Youth Sexual and Reproductive Health
COVID-19 Pandemic Shapes the Future World People Want
If Covid-19 is Primarily a ‘First World’ Virus, Why is the Global South in Lockdown?
We Need a Global Coordinated Effort to Secure Equal Access to Safe & Effective Vaccines
We Need a Global Coordinated Effort to Secure Equal Access to Safe & Effective Vaccines
Nothing to Learn from East Asia?
Covid-19: Lung Damage 'identified' in Study
Five Technologies That Will Transform Medicine In Post-Pandemic America
COVID-19 severity affected by proportion of antibodies targeting crucial viral protein
2020 New York Times Voices
WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard
GHD|EMPHNET Launches Online Courses on Response to Public Emergencies
EUPHA strategy 2020-2025
150 years of the International Review of the Red Cross
Three Ways Forward in a Post Covid-19 World
COVID-19: the worst may be yet to come
Medicine shortages in the EU: causes and solutions
Coronavirus Makes Inequality a Public Health Issue
A ‘Cure’ for Ebola but Will it Stop the Outbreak if People Won’t Get Treatment?
The Role of Women’s Organisations in Crisis-Settings
CRA shortage is worsening while demand grows – a vicious circle which opens masses of job opportunities
Why Doctors Hate Their Computers
Junior hospital doctors
90–90–90 Treatment for All
Incident Management System
Incident Management System
An Economy for the 99%
European Virus Archive goes global
Establishing a Global Vaccine-Development Fund

educational newsletter

 

Helix - Forschung & Beratung WienÖsterreichische Akademie der ÄrzteEuropean Public Health Association (EUPHA)European Health Forum GasteinAnästhesie in Entwicklungsländern e. V.AMREF - African Medical and Research FoundationÖsterreichisches Rotes KreuzCenter of Excellence