Technology and the demise of medicine
Revolutionary breakthroughs in technology, the rise of neoliberalism, and the dazzling progress of medicine have shaped our world like never before. From astonishing advancements to hidden pitfalls, this thrilling exploration delves into the captivating narrative of progress and its unintended consequences.
Since the Second World War, we have seen a creation of previously unimaginable armaments, developments in computing and the internet, along with medical advances, including era defining pharmaceuticals. We now face an emergence of Artificial Intelligence (A.I.), which may be the most extraordinary of all, not least in the health domain.
We view these as technologies. Techne originally referred to the principles involved in making something or obtaining an objective, instantiated in machines or code. Techne is also the origin for techniques whose impact on us has been just as profound as that of technologies.
Advances in both our technical and technological capacities and imagination have coincided with political and economic developments often called neoliberalism, and medical developments we might call neomedicalism.
Neoliberalism, for many, is synonymous with capitalism and markets. Its supporters claim that combining capitalism and markets creates a dynamic process that has produced unprecedented innovation. Its doubters point to an ineluctable logic driving extraordinary transfer of wealth from the many to the few.
Many of the ills of modern society are ascribed to neoliberalism but there is no diagnosis, no picking out of an essential and remediable feature. Transposing the dynamics to a medical setting may allow us to make a diagnosis and intervene. But first what is Liberalism?
Ur Liberalism
Liberalism, initially predicated on individual rights, liberty, and choice in respect of religious belief, later endorsed the freedom to choose found in free markets. Adam Smith borrowed the ideas of ‘laissez faire’ and entrepreneurs from French physiocrats, many of them doctors like François Quesnay, who argued that society, like human bodies and nature, could self-regulate. A growing pace of technological developments to supply new markets led to the French revolution, in which modern clinical medicine and public health were born.
After the Revolution, industrialization and urbanization came into the frame, along with a displacement from and alienation from machine-work. In Lyon, Ėtienne Cabet founded a communist party, and research by Louis Villermé on the health of craftsmen transitioning to machinists established public and occupational health. Borrowing from Villermé, Friedrich Engels wrote The Condition of the Working Class in England, more a public health than a political tract.
Read the whole article here.
